Executive perspectives on governance, synthetic capability integration and defence market positioning.
About this Strategic Insights platform
Strategic commentary grounded in national-level capability leadership and Nordic defence ecosystem understanding. These articles address the intersection of governance and ownership, LVC and constructive architecture, defence transformation, and market positioning and acquisition dynamics.
|
|
Featured Insight
Read Full Insight |
Browse the full library. New posts appear automatically.
-
Why does Military Synthetic Training not Scale Well?
Insights Why Does Military Synthetic Training Not Scale Well? After twenty-four years running live, constructive and virtual training; Military Synthetic Training in the Norwegian Army — the technology works. What consistently fails is the systems thinking that connects it. 10–12 min read · Military Synthetic Training · LVC Integration · Defence Procurement · Norwegian Army · VBS4 What is Military…
-
Constructive Simulation: Training the Division to Think and Fight
Strategic Insight Training Division to Think and Fight: Getting Constructive Simulation Right February 2026 · Ken-Tore Saade Eriksen Constructive simulation only creates readiness when it trains cognition: decision-making under uncertainty, tempo, friction, and consequence. For much of the past two decades, division- and brigade-level headquarters training received less attention than lower-echelon readiness. Expeditionary operations and force reductions shifted focus toward…
-
Who Actually Owns Training and Simulation Outcomes?
Strategic Insight Who Actually Owns Training and Simulation Outcomes? Eriksen LiveSim Consult · Strategic governance for measurable readiness Training outcomes are often described as a shared responsibility — but in practice, they are frequently owned by no one. While systems, instructors and units all contribute, accountability for measurable training effect is often unclear. This lack of ownership represents a strategic…
-
Governance Is the Real Training System
Strategic Insight Governance Is the Real Training System Eriksen LiveSim Consult · Governance, ownership, measurable readiness To expand on my two previous posts, I have come to the conclusion that Governance Is the Real Training System. Post 1: Why Training and Simulation Decisions Fail – Even When the Technology Works Post 2: If Simulation Is Optional, It Is Not a…
-
If Simulation Is Optional, It Is Not a Capability
Strategic Insight If Simulation Is Optional – It Is Not a Capability Eriksen LiveSim Consult · Governance, mandate, measurable readiness If simulation is optional, it does not constitute a capability. In large organisations, optional use inevitably leads to uneven standards, declining proficiency, and weak return on investment. This is not a cultural issue or a question of motivation — it…
-
Why Training and Simulation Decisions Fail – Even When the Technology Works
Strategic Insight Why Training and Simulation Fail – Even When the Technology Works Eriksen LiveSim Consult · Governance, ownership, operational effect Despite significant investment in advanced training and simulation systems, many defence organisations struggle to realise lasting operational capability. The reason is rarely technological. More often, it lies in unclear ownership, weak mandate and insufficient governance after delivery. When responsibility…
Executive Dialogue
For strategic growth discussions, Nordic positioning, and governance-driven transformation dialogue.
Connect